不同材料冠修复体对前牙牙周健康的影响

    王祥芸 黄大海 胡蓉 杨杨 张晓渝 彭蓓 温红萍 刘佳 钱慧芬

    

    

    

    [摘要]目的:探究鈷铬合金、银钯合金、二氧化锆和玻璃陶瓷四种不同修复体对前牙缺损患者的近远期治疗效果影响。方法:选取2017年2月-2019年4月来笔者医院就诊的前牙牙体缺损患者152例,采用随机数表法分为四组,分别为钴铬合金组、银钯合金组、二氧化锆组和玻璃陶瓷组,每组38例。各组患者入院完善相关检查后,分别采用钴铬合金、银钯合金、二氧化锆或玻璃陶瓷材料修复缺损牙体,分别对比各组患者修复前、修复后6个月及修复后12个月牙龈指数变化情况;比较各组患者治疗效果并对各组患者进行为期2年随访,评价患者远期疗效;比较各组患者修复前、修复后6个月及修复后12个月龈沟液内天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)表达水平变化情况。结果:各组患者治疗前牙龈指数比较无明显差别,玻璃陶瓷组和二氧化锆组修复后6个月牙龈指数明显下降,修复后12个月玻璃陶瓷组较其余各组明显降低,结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05);各组患者治疗后疗效显示:玻璃陶瓷组患者远期疗效较好,二氧化锆组较钯银合金、钴铬合金组远期疗效好,结果具有统计学意义(均P<0.05);修复前各组患者龈沟液内AST、ALP表达水平无明显差异,修复后6个月及12个月玻璃陶瓷及二氧化锆组患者下降明显,其余组无明显差异,结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:牙体缺损修复时应用玻璃陶瓷、二氧化锆较钴铬合金、银钯合金材料的治疗效果更佳,可以显著改善AST、ALP表达水平以降低牙周炎症反应,缓解前牙缺损临床症状。

    [关键词]钴铬合金;银钯合金;二氧化锆;玻璃陶瓷;前牙体修复

    [中图分类号]R783.3? ? [文献标志码]A? ? [文章编号]1008-6455(2020)12-0150-04

    Effects of Different Restorations on Periodontal Health of Anterior Teeth

    WANG Xiang-yun,HUANG Da-hai,HU Rong,YANG Yang, ZHANG Xiao-yu,PENG Bei,WEN Hong-ping,LIU Jia,QIAN Hui-fen

    (Department of Prosthodontics,Yunnan Second People's Hospital,Kunming 650021,Yunnan,China)

    Abstract: Objective? To explore the effect of different kinds of gingival restorations, such as cobalt chromium alloy, silver palladium alloy, zirconia and glass ceramics, on the short-term and long-term treatment of patients with anterior teeth defects. Methods? From February 2017 to April 2019, 152 patients with anterior teeth defect were randomly divided into four groups: cobalt chromium alloy group, silver palladium alloy group, zirconium dioxide group and glass ceramic group, 38 in each group. After the patients in each group were admitted to the hospital to complete the relevant examination, they were repaired with cobalt chromium alloy, silver palladium alloy, zirconium dioxide or glass ceramic materials respectively. The gingival index changes of each group before, 6 months after and 12 months after the restoration were compared. The treatment effect of each group was compared and the patients in each group were followed up for 2 years to evaluate the long-term treatment effect of the patients The expression of AST and ALP in gingival crevicular fluid were compared before, 6 months and 12 months after restoration. Results There was no significant difference in gingival index before treatment in each group. The gingival index of glass ceramic group and zirconia group decreased significantly in 6 months after repair, and that of glass ceramic group decreased significantly in 12 months after repair compared with the rest groups, with statistical significance (P<0.05). After treatment, the therapeutic effect of each group showed that the long-term effect of glass ceramic group was better than that of palladium silver alloy group There was no significant difference in AST and ALP expression level in gingival crevicular fluid between the groups before and after the repair, but there was a significant decrease in glass ceramics and zirconia group at 6 and 12 months after the repair, while there was no significant difference in the other groups (P<0.05). Conclusion? The application of glass ceramic and zirconium dioxide in the restoration of tooth defects is better than cobalt-chromium alloy and silver-palladium alloy materials. It can significantly improve the expression of AST and ALP to reduce periodontal inflammation and relieve the clinical symptoms of anterior tooth defects.

    2.3 各组患者修复前,修复后6、12个月龈沟液炎症因子表达水平:修复前各组患者龈沟液内AST、ALP表达水平无差异,修复后6、12个月玻璃陶瓷和二氧化锆组患者龈沟液内AST、ALP表达量均有下降,其余组无明显差异,结果具有统计学意义(P<0.05),见表4。

    3? 讨论

    不同原因引起的前牙牙体缺损广泛发生于各年龄阶层,其造成患者外貌不美观,严重患者出现咀嚼、发声困难,甚至颌面部畸形,严重影响患者身心健康,选择合适的修复体是该类患者首选治疗方式[11]。随着材料技术发展,已有多种材料被应用于牙冠修复体制作,不同的材料具有不同的临床使用优点,玻璃陶瓷材料和二氧化锆材料是现使用最广的修复体材料,由于组织相容性好等特点,且其表面更为光滑,菌斑不易附着,可以明显减少牙体上细菌聚集,从而减少牙体及周围牙龈组织刺激,另外其颜色稳定性亦高,对患者修复后远期预后有一定帮助,患者认可度逐渐提高[12]。王玉杰等[13]研究认为玻璃陶瓷全瓷修复体相较于铬钴合金修复体具有更好的远期并发症防范作用,而二氧化锆及玻璃陶瓷修复体强度高,组织相容性好,对牙体周围牙龈炎症发生有一定抑制作用。马玉龙等[14]研究则指出钴铬合金前牙冠修复体远期不良反应发生率较高,且其易引发周围牙龈组织炎症。

    AST是一种可溶性细胞胞浆酶,健康状态下,绝大部分AST存在于细胞胞浆内,当组织破坏细胞坏死时,则有大量AST出现于细胞外环境。牙周炎患者龈沟液中AST水平明显高于健康者,牙周活动性位点与非活动性位点相比,AST水平有显著差异,并与牙周临床指数高度正相关。AST可作为早期牙周病变的标志和牙周炎病变活动期的辅助诊断指标,还可以对健康和患病位点进行区分。近年的一些研究提示,龈沟液中的AST指标可能与牙周疾病的临床和病理指标有明显的关联。牙齿处于炎症状态下的龈沟液中AST水平比处于牙龈炎和健康牙状态下的水平要高出很多[15]。ALP是一种非特异性的水解酶,是较早用于临床诊断的酶类,牙周膜细胞中含有丰富的ALP,ALP来源通常认为是牙周膜细胞破裂或通透性增高ALP外溢,其次是龈下革兰阴性细菌代谢产生。ALP是成骨细胞成熟的标志,与骨组织钙化密切相关,可以作为骨吸收破坏的标志[16]。牙周炎时牙周组织破坏,牙周膜细胞破裂或通透性增强,释放出ALP,使牙周袋内ALP水平升高。有研究证明,炎症牙位GCF中ALP水平是血清中的20倍。因此,ALP作为反映牙周破坏程度比较敏感的指标被广泛应用[17]。

    本文探究不同材料修复体对前牙体缺损患者近远期疗效影响,以及炎症反应发生情况。结果显示玻璃陶瓷、二氧化锆治疗效果显著好于其他材料,且远期并发症发生率低,组织炎症因子表达水平低。说明玻璃陶瓷等全瓷类修复体相较于合金类修复体具有更好的生物相容性,强度高,颜色稳定性也更好,黑线、牙体颜色退色可能性明显降低;文中所讨论的玻璃陶瓷等全瓷类修复体均不含金属离子,相较于合金修复体其不会出现金属离子进入牙体周围组织情况,组织相容性好,且玻璃陶瓷类少发生过敏及中毒反应,其安全性高,局部刺激小,故局部炎症发生率明显降低;玻璃陶瓷全瓷类使用疗效优于合金类修复体。其原因可能是因为其物理结构致密,边缘贴合更好,不利于菌斑与色素附着,具有较好稳定性质,远期疗效更好。

    综上所述,研究认为玻璃陶瓷等全瓷类修复体相较于铬钴合金类修复体具有更好的远期并发症防范作用,而二氧化锆及玻璃陶瓷修复体组织相容性好,对牙体周围牙龈周围炎症发生有一定抑制作用。牙体缺损修复时应用玻璃陶瓷、二氧化锆较钴铬合金及银钯合金材料的疗效好。.钴铬合金修复体远期不良反应发生率较高,且其易引发周围牙龈组织炎症。

    [参考文献]

    [1]王玉玮,李丁新,赵飞,等.氧化锆桩核与金属桩修复前牙牙体缺损的效果观察[J].解放军医药杂志,2017,29(8):72-74.

    [2]Sundeep D,Vijaya Kumar T,Rao PSS,et al.Green synthesis and characterization of Ag nanoparticles from Mangifera indica leaves for dental restoration and antibacterial applications[J].Prog Biomater,2017,6(1-2):57-66.

    [3]陈智,陈瑞甜.牙体修复新观念[J].口腔医学研究,2019,35(1):1-9.

    [4]赵楚翘,刘志辉,王博蔚.影响后牙牙體缺损修复生物力学多因素分析研究进展[J].口腔医学研究,2017,33(12):1342-1344.

    [5]Kuai JC,Jiang CR,Wang JW,et al.The ELID grinding of CoCrMo alloy bioprosthesis and the formation mechanism of its corrosion-resistant oxide layer[J].Mater Sci Forum, 2018,934:140-144.

    [6]王玉杰,马兰,董文博.三种临床常用牙科合金材料对牙周软组织影响的动物实验研究[J]. 全科口腔医学电子杂志,2017,4(11):50-51.

    [7]马玉龙,王海山,那日苏.钴铬合金烤瓷冠和全瓷冠修复对患牙牙周组织及龈沟液中炎症因子水平的影响研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2016,9(12):747-750.

    [8]苗朝旭,王竞博,房博.正畸微型种植体对安氏Ⅱ类错颌畸形患者牙周炎症及MMP-2、MMP-9的影响[J].海南医学,2019,30(12):1578-1580.

    [9]N, R,Carlos,et al.Influence of staining solutions on color change and enamel surface properties during at-home and in-office dental bleaching: an in situ study[J].Oper Dent,2019,44(6):595-608.

    [10]宫苹.牙缺失种植修复并发症与咬合[J].中华口腔医学杂志,2018,53(12):800-804.

    [11]马胤喆.陶瓷高嵌体与全冠修复无髓后牙的临床操作及疗效对比[J].中国美容医学, 2019,28(7):99-103.

    [12]张津京,陆支越.老年人牙齿结构和疲劳对全瓷高嵌体断裂强度的影响[J]. 中华老年医学杂志,2019,38(2):181-184.

    [13]刘晓艳,张先琴,石新莹.等.二氧化锆全瓷冠修复对前牙牙体缺损患者咀嚼效能及PLI、GI变化的影响[J].中国医疗美容,2019,9(3):76-80.

    [14]Yaming,Zhang,Haixia,et al.Effect of added mullite whisker on properties of lithium aluminosilicate (las) glass-ceramics prepared for dental restoration[J].J Biomed Nanotechnol,2018,14(11):1944-1952.

    [15]王丽娟,王莉华.慢性牙周炎患者种植修复后临床疗效及对龈沟液炎性因子和基质金属蛋白酶水平的影响[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2019,35(6):354-358.

    [16]Hosadurga R,Boloor VA,Rao SN, et al.Effectiveness of two different herbal toothpaste formulations in the reduction of plaque and gingival inflammation in patients with established gingivitis-A randomized controlled trial[J].J Tradit Complement Med,2017,8(1):113-119.

    [17]吳凯悦,许春姣,池毓坦,等.Er:YAG激光治疗慢性牙周炎对龈沟液中Dickkopf-1水平和ALP活性的影响[J].上海口腔医学,2017,26(3):285-289.

    [收稿日期]2020-02-12

    本文引用格式:王祥芸,黄大海,胡蓉,等.不同材料冠修复体对前牙牙周健康的影响[J].中国美容医学,2020,29(12):150-153.